Jump to content

Talk:British Rail Class 380

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Classes 320 and 322

[edit]

To inform you all that the Class 322 EMU fleet are to come off lease from First ScotRail in 2010/from next year, when the Class 380 EMU arrive at First ScotRail. The Class 320 is to be *RETAINED* by First ScotRail and are NOT being withdrawn from service. Information came from Rail (magazine).

--Peter Skuce (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delay

[edit]

Here is a passenger announcement. "Glitches on new trains mean six-month delay to services - Herald Scotland | News | Transport & Environment". Retrieved 2011-01-03. . . . . dave souza, talk 19:41, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possible change to the title of this article

[edit]

This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Avicennasis (talkcontribs) 18:23, 10 March 2011

Four-car units

[edit]

I think that I'm right in saying that Class 380/1 were the first four-car EMUs to be allocated to Scotland; indeed, so far as I can work out, all previous EMUs in Scotland, right back to the Class 303 of fifty years earlier, had three cars. Does anybody have a source which explicitly states that 380/1 were the first Scottish EMUs not to have three cars? --Redrose64 (talk) 16:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Class 322s operated in Scotland. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, yes, there were only five units, they were there from 2001 to 2011 and I think they only operated east of Edinburgh, so I probably missed them. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Rail Class 380. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]